Obstructing symplectic embeddings into CP^2 and S^2xS^2

Hello from the CRM in Montreal, where I am at a very nice conference this week. In my talk I attempted (among other things) to present the following theorem. Unfortunately my explanation was not very organized and I said a couple of things slightly wrong. (Sorry audience!) So let me attempt to explain all this more clearly here. Below, c_k denotes the k^{th} ECH capacity.

Theorem. Let (X,\omega) be a disjoint union of finitely many star-shaped domains in {\mathbb R}^4. If (X,\omega) can be symplectically embedded into {\mathbb C}P^2(1), then c_k(X,\omega)\le c_k(B(1)) for all k. Likewise, if (X,\omega) can be symplectically embedded into S^2(a)\times S^2(b), then c_k(X,\omega)\le c_k(P(a,b)) for all k.

That is, as far as ECH capacities are concerned, embedding into {\mathbb CP}^2 is no easier than embedding into a ball; and embedding into S^2\times S^2 is no easier than embedding into a polydisk. (One can prove things for more general Liouville domains (X,\omega), for example using the completed ECH capacities introduced here last August, but assuming that X is a union of star-shaped domains makes life simpler.)

First, recall that if (X,\omega) is a strong symplectic cobordism from (Y_+,\lambda_+) to (Y_-,\lambda_-), then for each real number L and each class A\in H_2(X,\partial X) there is an induced map

\Phi^L(X,\omega,A): ECH^L(Y_+,\lambda_+,\partial_+A) \to ECH^{L+\rho(A)}(Y_-,\lambda_-,\partial_-A).

Here \rho:H_2(X,\partial X)\to{\mathbb R} is a homomorphism which measures the failure of \omega and the contact forms to obey Stokes’s theorem. (I explained this here last May.) This cobordism map commutes with the U maps on the top and bottom and preserves the contact invariant. If X is closed and c_1(A)+A\cdot A=0, then \Phi^L(X,\omega,A)(\emptyset)\in {\mathbb Z}/2 is the Gromov/Seiberg-Witten invariant Gr(X,\omega,A) mod 2 for any L>0. One can recover Gromov invariants Gr(X,\omega,A) with c_1(A)+A\cdot A=2k>0 as follows: suppose Y is a contact type hypersurface splitting X into two unions of components X_+ and X_- so that there is a contact form \lambda on Y making X_+ into a cobordism from the empty set to (Y,\lambda) and X_- into a cobordism from (Y,\lambda) to the empty set. Suppose for simplicity that H_2(Y) maps to zero in H_2(X). Let A_\pm denote the restriction of A to H_2(X_\pm,Y). Let U^k denote any composition of k of the U maps (possibly repeated) associated to the components of Y. Then

\Phi^{L+\rho(A_+)}(X_-,\omega,A_-)\circ U^k \circ \Phi^L(X_+,\omega,A_+)(\emptyset) = Gr(X,\omega,A) \mod 2

for any L>0. The idea here is that Gr(X,\omega,A) counts holomorphic curves in X in the class A with k point constraints, and to prove the formula we can stretch the neck along Y and put the constraining points into the neck. (The real proof of course uses Seiberg-Witten.)

Now to prove the first part of the theorem, let (X_-,\omega_-) be a disjoint union of star-shaped domains and suppose that (X_-,\omega_-) symplectically embeds into {\mathbb C}P^2(1). Recall that the ECH capacities of the ball B(1) are given by c_k(B(1))=d whenever

\frac{d^2+d}{2} \le k \le \frac{d^2+3d}{2}.

So it is enough to show that if 2k=d^2+3d then c_k(X_-,\omega_-)\le d. For this purpose let X_+ denote the complement of the image of X_- in {\mathbb C}P^2, and let A=dH\in H_2({\mathbb C}P^2) where H denotes the homology class of a line. Then c_1(A)+A\cdot A=d^2+3d and Gr({\mathbb C}P^2,A)=1 mod 2 (by the wall crossing formula for Seiberg-Witten invariants). Also, \rho(A_+)=d. So for any L>0, the above composition property implies that \eta = \Phi^L(X_+,A_+)(\emptyset) is a class in ECH^{L+d}(Y,\lambda) such that \Phi^{L+d}(X_-,\omega_-)U^k\eta=1. Note that \Phi^{L+d}(X_-,\omega_-) sends the contact invariant to 1 and all classes of positive grading to zero. It follows from the previous two sentences, similarly to the proof of Proposition 4.5 in my paper “Quantitative ECH”, that c_k(X_-,\omega_-)\le L+d. Since L>0 was arbitrary, we are done.

The argument for embeddings into S^2\times S^2 is similar. Recall that

c_k(P(a,b))=\min\{am+bn\mid (m+1)(n+1)\ge k+1\}

where m and n are nonnegative integers. Now suppose that (X_-,\omega_-) is a disjoint union of star-shaped domains that embeds into S^2(a)\times S^2(b). It is enough to show that if k,m,n are nonnegative integers with (m+1)(n+1)= k+1 then c_k(X_-,\omega_-)\le am+bn. For this purpose let A=(m,n)\in H_2(S^2\times S^2). Then c_1(A)+A\cdot A = 2(mn+m+n)=2k, and Gr(S^2(a)\times S^2(b),A)=1 mod 2 by the wall crossing formula for Seiberg-Witten invariants. The rest of the argument is the same as before.

I’ll continue my series about rational SFT shortly; I have done some calculations and while there were some initial disappointments, things are now getting very interesting.

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in ECH. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Obstructing symplectic embeddings into CP^2 and S^2xS^2

  1. Ian Agol says:

    Hey, I’m at the University of Montreal too!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s